I encounter this claim all the time. People who make it must be seriously dedicated to their biases to find this "implication" anywhere in the Bible.
Torah, Bible study, politics, science fiction and fantasy, whatever else I feel like talking about.
Like Enoch?
The only complete manuscripts of the first book of Enoch (the only one that has even the remotest claim to legitimacy) are in Ge'ez (Coptic), which Enoch definitely did not speak in 3000 BC. Only a handful of pre-Christian fragments exist in Aramaic (also not Enoch's language) and one or two very small fragments in Hebrew.
If First Enoch represents the actual words of Noah's great grandfather, it is--at best--a translation of a
translation: at least two layers of translator bias between us and Enoch.
That was just for the Jews!
Introducing Regular Guy and Friends
Regular Guy's theology isn't deep or complicated. He just takes what Jesus and the Apostles said at face value and believes them. He gets a lot of pushback from people want to pile a lot of nuance and systematic theology onto the Scriptures.
Here are the characters in Regular Guy's life so far:
| Regular Guy |
| Platitude Girl |
| Hippie Man |
| The Pastor |
| Calvinist Man |
![]() |
| Enoch Lady |
