Showing posts with label Hebrew Roots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hebrew Roots. Show all posts

All the gods' birthdays?

 



Someone shared this meme with me this morning. (The red X is my own addition.) It claims that all of these ancient pagan deities were born on December 25th:

  • Horus (Egypt)
  • Osiris (Egypt)
  • Attis (Greece)
  • Krishna (India)
  • Zoroaster (Persia)
  • Mithra (Persia)
  • Prometheus (Greece)
  • Heracles (Greece)
  • Dionysius (Greece)
  • Tammuz (Babylon)
  • Adonis (Greece) 
  • Hermes (Greece)
Problem 1: Neither Egypt, Greece, India, Persia, nor Babylon had a month named "December".

December means "10th month", but the Roman calendar had been divorced from lunar cycles some 5 centuries before Christ, and then months were added in the middle to make the 10th month into the 12th month. All of these cultures used multiple calendars simultaneously. There were solar/astrological months, lunar months, seasonal divisions, etc., but none of them had a month that corresponded precisely to the Roman December.

Problem 2: It's just plain wrong.

Horus' birthday was celebrated in late summer, as was Zoroaster's. Krishna's was celebrated in early summer. There is no historical record of a birthday celebration for Mithras among the ancient Iranians. Osiris' birthday (or rebirth day) was celebrated in the spring.

Evidently, whoever made this meme just made the entire thing up. I haven't checked, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the images on the depicted coins have no connection at all to the names under them.

The Lesson: Stop believing everything you read or hear on the Internet no matter how true it sounds and no matter how badly you want it to be true.

Think for yourself. Do even a tiny bit of research before repeating things. Don't cause the world to blaspheme God's name by repeating lies and hysteria.

Objections to Keeping Torah





Torah

Torah is a Hebrew word that means "instruction" or "law", depending on the context. It refers to the first five books of the Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy), also commonly known as the Pentateuch. When Yeshua (aka Jesus) spoke of "the Law and the Prophets", he was referring to the Torah and the rest of the Old Testament. 

You might also hear of the "oral Torah", which refers to a semi-mythical tradition that was passed down to the ancient rabbis from Moses by word of mouth, as opposed to the written Torah referenced above. Those rabbis debated and discussed them, and the records of those discussions are recorded in the various Talmuds. I don't think there can be any doubt that Moses gave oral instructions that were never written down, because there is much in the written Torah that can't be fully understood otherwise. However, I don't think those instructions survived intact for the rabbis to discuss them. Clearly the religious leaders of Yeshua's day had a very confused understanding of the Torah, so it seems very unlikely that they had straightened it all out a few hundred years later. It's much more likely that they had gone even further astray.

That's not to say that the Talmud and rabbinic traditions are worthless. If you understand that it contains a record of debates, not just a straightforward recounting of oral tradition, then you can look past some of the more offensive and blasphemous contents to find some really profound and insightful bits. It's not divinely inspired Scripture, but it is useful for historical context and perspective.

The written Torah, however, most certainly is divinely inspired, parts of it originally written directly by the hand of God himself. It is the foundation for all later revelation. None of the books of history, poetry, and prophecy, the Gospels, and the Epistles can be understood without a solid foundation in the Torah.

The Torah Movement

At this very moment, there is a spontaneous, global movement of people who worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob to study the Torah and apply its instructions to their real lives. There is no leader, no central committee, no parent organization, and no headquarters of this movement. There isn't even a commonly accepted name. People in this movement call themselves Christians, Messianic Jews, Messianic Believers, Torah-Keepers, Hebrew Roots, Pronomians, Nazarene Israelites, and numerous other labels.

I don't particularly care for any of those labels, but I've used several of them for myself at times.

Regardless of the labels, they all have two things in common:

  1. Yeshua is the Son of God, Messiah, and King of Israel.
  2. The Torah still applies today to followers of Yeshua.
Beyond that, there is an almost infinite variation in their interpretations of Scripture. 

There is also a lot of controversy within the rest of the Body of Christ as to what to do with these upstart Obeyers of God's Commandments. Some even deny that we are a part of the Body of Christ at all, claiming that we have rejected God's grace in favor of earning our salvation. (I'm sure they're right about a very small minority.) Some radicals say that any willful attempt to obey any of God's commandments is a rejection of grace. Fortunately, most Christians reject those people in turn.

The Controversy


Of course, all of this means I've put together quite a few words on the subject of whether a follower of Yeshua--or Jesus, if you prefer...it's the same man--ought to obey the full Law of God or not.

A point of clarification on "the Law of God"... Some people make a distinction between the Law of God and the Law of Moses. The distinction is mostly artificial. The instructions that God gave through Moses at Sinai are a written expression of the Law of God. The Law of Moses is the Law of God as it was conveyed in a specific time and space, to a specific people as part of a specific covenant.

Below, I have attempted to catalog all of my online teachings on Torah-keeping, organized by sub-topic, but not in any other kind of order. There's a lot of overlap, and I'm sure to forget some articles or videos, so please search American Torah, Soil from Stone, Rumble, YouTube, and other sites for more from myself and many other fine teachers.

A caveat if you do search for other defenses or refutations of Torah-keeping, though: There is a vast spectrum of quality in the content you will find. Unless you are very thoroughly versed in the Scriptures and confident in your beliefs, I recommend that you set aside the teachings of anyone who denies the divinity of Yeshua or who denies that God has any objective standards of morality for his people.

Salvation by Faith

Does the Law Apply to Christians?

Under the Law

The Weekly Sabbath






Is Revelation 20-22 a Later Addition?

Someone recently told me that he believes that the last three chapters of Revelation are in direct contradiction to the last eleven chapters of Ezekiel because of the timing of the resurrection of the dead (Ezekiel 37 and Revelation 20) and other details about the New Jerusalem. He couldn't see any way to reconcile these two passages, so he concluded that Revelation 20-22 must have been added after the early church had been heavily corrupted by Greek influence.

After reading the relevant chapter of his book twice, here was my response:

After reading chapter 9 of your book, Ezekiel 37-48, and Revelation 20-22 once again, here are my final thoughts on the matter:

Ezekiel 37 isn't a literal resurrection of the dead, but a restoration of the nation of Israel that happens immediately before or after the onset of the Millennial Era. Ezekiel 40-48 are mostly metaphor about an idealized people of Israel, their repentance and restoration, a righteous remnant of the priesthood, and the adoption of righteous Torah-keepers from the nations. The temple and city described in much detail aren't a literal temple and city, but a pattern to which God desires Israel to conform. I believe for at least two reasons that even the later description of the division of the land is almost certainly a metaphor: 1) The apportioned land is only a fraction of what God promised to Israel, 2) the tribal allocations are parallel strips of land with no regard to terrain, natural boundaries, or sizes of the tribes.

In Revelation 20, only vs 1-10 are about the Millennial Era, what you refer to as the Kingdom age. V11 begins the final resurrection and judgment and chapter 21 represents the onset of a recreated universe populated only by the resurrected righteous. It's possible that the new earth is metaphor, but since this follows the 1000 year reign, resurrection of all the dead, and the final judgment, it is clearly a different kind of world than what existed during the Millennial Era. During the Millennium, the nations still exist, sin and death are still present. Yeshua's rule will be absolute within the fully realized land of Israel, but the nations will be mostly autonomous. After the final judgment, all of those things have been abolished.

At first, Isaiah 65 seems to support the idea that the new heaven and earth of Revelation 21 is metaphor, but the new heaven and earth of Isaiah 65 still has death and sin, so I don't think they are talking about the same thing.

As for the validity of Revelation 20-22, the Ante-Nicene Church Fathers quoted from all three chapters.

  • Ireneaus (130-202 AD) quoted numerous passages from Revelation 20-21 in Against Heresies.
  • Justin Martyr (100-165 AD) made a direct reference to Revelation 20:4-5 in Dialogue with Trypho.
  • Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD) quoted from Rev 21:6 in an address on plagiarisms. 
  • Tertullian (155-220 AD) quoted and referenced numerous passages from Revelation 20-22 in Against Marcion. 
  • Hypolytus (170-235 AD) quoted from Rev 20:6 and 22:15 in his Treatise on Christ and Antichrist. 
  • Cyprian (210-258 AD) quoted Rev 22:10-12 in his Treatise on the Advantage of Patience and Rev 22:4-5 in his Exhortation to Martyrdom. 

There are more. If it were only a couple of quotes from one or two authors, it would at least be possible that Revelation 20-22 were added in a later century and then a few quotes inserted into those extrabiblical writers to add support. However, there are dozens of quotes from numerous authors throughout the second and third centuries. This shows that the final 3 chapters of Revelation were present by 165 AD at the latest and so it seems very unlikely that they were not original with John.

I should add that I do not believe any of those church fathers are reliable theologians and some of them were heretics of the worst kind, but that's beside the point. They all quoted from the last three chapters of Revelation. Whatever one might think of the men and their theologies, the textual witness is very strong evidence that Revelation 20-22 is legitimate.

Whenever anyone asserts that some part of the Bible should be removed because he doesn't agree with the content, you need to be immediately on your guard. Don't take anything at face value. Test everything. Verify every claim. Look for alternative explanations.

What Is Hebrew Roots?

"Hebrew Roots" is a term that some people apply to anyone who uses Hebrew-ish terminology and believes (or entertains) a set of ideas they don't like. They use it as an insult in the same way that some antisemites use the term "Jew" to apply only to those Jews who act or believe a certain way. Personally, I find the term to have only two useful definitions:

1) A pronomian of non-Jewish heritage who accepts Yeshua (Jesus, Yahusha, etc.) as the Messiah and believes he has been grafted (adopted, joined, etc.) into the chosen nation of Israel.
2) All of definition #1 with the addition of the adoption of Jewish-like traditions, such as tallit-wearing and using Hebrew terms for religious concepts, like Shabbat instead of Sabbath, mashiach instead of messiah, etc.

In either of these definitions, the only difference between "Messianic Judaism" and "Hebrew Roots" is ethnic heritage, although a Messianic Jew is not necessarily pronomian.

Ironically, most of the people who use "Hebrew Roots" as an insult *ARE* Hebrew Roots themselves. Of course, nobody else is obligated to accept my definitions of anything.

I have waffled over the years about whether or not I am "Hebrew Roots", but clearly by this definition I am. Labels are of limited value, though. Being "Hebrew Roots" is a little like being "Christian". It covers a lot of territory.

The Hebrew Roots Movement is a spontaneous, worldwide movement of Christians drawn to the Hebrew Bible, to keep God's commandments as he intended, and to live as Yeshua lived.

Because this movement is spontaneous and counter-cultural, it can be a little chaotic and attracts a lot of people who have an affinity for the fringes. There is no organization or central leadership, so there is a lot of opportunity for charismatic and just plain loud people to claim the stage. 

When some people realize they have been taught some lies about the Scriptures, they react very badly, suspecting everything and everyone of trying to deceive them. Ironically, because they are emotionally driven, these people are easy targets for other deceivers. They can become bitter, angry, and even paranoid, making them easily sucked into the absurdities of Sacred Name and Flat Earth. They need true leadership, but they're too afraid to trust anyone. I don't know what to do to help them other than to keep trying to be a calm voice of sanity.

Fortunately, the vast majority of people in the HRM are not bitter and angry. They aren't Sacred Namers or Flat Earthers. They haven't rejected Jesus. They haven't rejected salvation by faith. They haven't rejected Paul. They don't demand that everyone spell God's name exactly like they do. They're good people who are just trying to do the right thing.

Unfortunately, the angry and bitter voices, the prideful and hateful voices are so much louder that they're the only ones that most people remember, and so the entire movement gets painted with that craziness.

Don't be the one holding that brush. Don't be a slanderer of God's people. Don't assume that every disciple of Jesus who has decided to take God's Law (aka Torah) seriously is a lunatic Torah terrorist. Don't violate the two greatest commandments as well as the 3rd, 6th, and 9th of the Ten just because you had a bad experience with a few people who do NOT represent the hundreds of thousands that didn't stick in your memory.

[Apparently, I didn't realize that I had written another article on the same topic with the same title just a month earlier. The question comes up a lot. lol]

Making Idols of Ideas

I posted this image (below) yesterday on multiple social media platforms. When I created the image, I was specifically thinking of some of the more outlandish conspiracy theories that people fiercely hold onto despite almost universal opposition, despite all physical evidence, despite all reason. Within minutes, somebody--not Hebrew Roots, by his own assertion--replied with a long list of ideas that he believes other people make into idols. It just went on and on, point after outlandish, bizarre point. This guy took my generic admonish not to hold so tightly to an idea that you become incapable of rational thought, to vomit this morass of paranoid delusions onto my readers.

My immediate reaction was incredulousness. How could anyone read this image and think *that* is the appropriate response? But as I read on, I could tell that he was perfectly serious. Not only was he serious, but he was angry, bitter at a world that refused to acknowledge a truth that was plain as day to him. By the time I got to the end...I was angry and disgusted that there are people lost in such hopeless fear and intent on pulling other people down with them. 

I deleted his comment, hopefully before anyone else saw it. Despite the obvious absurdity of his assertions, clearly a lot of people are eager to believe. My sincere hope is that I can intercept some of those people before they get lost in fear and confusion, help lead them back to solid ground in reality.

I felt sorry for this commenter and sorrier that experience tells me there is probably nothing I can do to help him. His beliefs are religious in nature, not rational. He didn't arrive at any of them by objectively analyzing evidence or Scripture. He is so thoroughly convinced of so much patent nonsense that he's far more likely to be helped by a psychiatrist-exorcist tag team than by a conversation with anyone on the Internet. I'm sure some time in prayer and Scripture reading--a pious-sounding solution, to be sure--would help, but I suspect he's already got that covered in spades.

But what he really, really needs more than anything else, is to get off the Internet and connect with a meatspace community of people who care about him enough to love him in spite of his insanity.



 

What Is Hebrew Roots?


When I began writing this article a few weeks ago, I would have defined "Hebrew Roots" as a spontaneous, worldwide movement of people from mostly Christian backgrounds drawn to return to the Hebraic roots of Christianity and to discover and apply the original intent of the writings in the Bible. Now I'm not sure that's accurate or even helpful, but I'll keep it for the next few paragraphs and backtrack at the end.

Sue me.

People place the origins of the Hebrew Roots Movement anywhere from the end of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century, but the nature of such movements make their precise origins very difficult to pin down. It is not a denomination or cult by any useful definition because it has no central leadership and no unified doctrinal statement or creed. It truly appears to be a spontaneous movement of people all over the world responding to God's Spirit calling them back to the "Old Paths" of Jeremiah 6:16. It did not begin with Herbert Armstrong and the Worldwide Church of God, nor with Messianic Judaism, nor any other specific religious organization or event, although many of those things might be manifestations of that response to some extent.

The organic character of the movement is both good and bad. It's good in that people everywhere are responding to a movement of God's Holy Spirit. It's bad in that the lack of leadership and unity has created some definite chaos, just as God was behind the conquest of Canaan before King David, but "every man did what was right in his own eyes." The Hebrew Roots Movement is a mix of ugly and beautiful right now. I believe this is a period of refining and that God is going to bring something much better out of it.

Since it is so chaotic, everybody seems to have a different idea of what "Hebrew Roots" is, even among HR people. Some people lump Messianic Judaism and Hebrew Roots together as a monolithic conspiracy to corrupt The Church (an actual, extreme view I read just this morning from someone I won't hesitate to label an anti-Christ liar). Others view Messianic Judaism as distinctly Jewish and Hebrew Roots as distinctly Christian or as a spectrum with no clear distinction. My experience has been somewhere in the middle and also very different than that of others in the movement.

In an effort go get a little more objective idea of what HR people really believe, I posted a series of polls at The Torah Network. This exercise was far from scientific and truly objective. For one thing, there weren't enough responses. For another, TTN isn't explicitly Hebrew Roots as opposed to Messianic Jewish, but its users believe that Yeshua (aka Jesus) is the Messiah and that all believers in Yeshua should be keeping God's Law (aka Torah). That's about the best "lowest common denominator" definition of Hebrew Roots you're going to find.

2023-02-10 Update: I asked these questions again in one of the larger Hebrew Roots groups on Facebook. Polls on social media will always produce "fuzzy" results, but I got mostly the same responses on both sites. Facebook has the added complication that I couldn't find a way to expire my polls, so the numbers below are a snapshot, not a final result.

In the end, though, what I really learned isn't what I expected. I think it actually tells me a lot more about the people who talk about Hebrew Roots people than it does about Hebrew Roots people themselves.

The Questions and Answers:

Do you believe that understanding the pictographic meanings of the Hebrew letters that make up a word are an important aspect of understanding the Tanakh (the Old Testament)? (30 votes)

  • 50% Definitely.
  • 30% Somewhat. (God and the Biblical authors understood the pictographic origins of the letters and could have used that understanding to add another layer of meaning to the text.)
  • 20% Not at all.

Do you believe that a person can only be saved if he correctly pronounces the name of God (aka the Tetragrammaton) and/or of the Messiah? (31 votes)

  • 96% Pronunciation is important for accuracy and meaning, but it's irrelevant to salvation.
  • 4% It doesn't matter what you call God or the Messiah.
  • 0% You must pronounce both names correctly.
  • 0% You must pronounce one or the other correctly.

Do you believe the earth is flat or ovoid? (91 votes)

  • 74% The earth is ovoid/spherical.
  • 20% The earth is flat.
  • 6% I don't know.

Do you believe that Paul (aka Saul of Tarsus) was a false prophet and/or a false teacher? (140 votes)

  • 97% Paul was a legitimate Apostle.
  • 2% Paul was a false teacher/prophet.
  • 1% Undecided

Do you believe the Bible is missing some books? (87 votes)

  • 48% The Bible is fine as it is.
  • 34% Anything that was in any ancient edition of the Septuagint should be in the Bible.
  • 17% The Bible is missing a few books, like Enoch, Jubilees, and Sirach.

Do you believe that Yeshua is God? (82 votes)

  • 66% Yeshua is God.
  • 28% Yeshua is the only begotten Son of God, but not God.
  • 6% Yeshua was a normal man, who was elevated by God to the role of Messiah.

Do you believe in "Two House" Theology?

For this question, I presented multiple, nuanced varieties of "Two House" theology that I have encountered over the last three decades. Apparently, there is so little agreement about what this term means that almost nobody was even able to answer the question.

When do you observe the weekly Sabbath? (172 votes)

  • 85% Sunset Friday to sunset Saturday
  • 7% According to the phases of the moon
  • 5% Some other time
  • 3% Sunday
  • 2% Sunrise to sunset on Saturday

Which label do you most closely identify with? (90 votes)

  • 61% Something else
  • 19% Hebrew Roots
  • 15% Christian
  • 5% Messianic Jew

What do you believe about the Jewish Talmuds? (69 votes)

  • 50% Useful
  • 30% Evil
  • 15% Irrelevant
  • 5% Inspired/Authoritative

Although all of these people would probably be labeled "Hebrew Roots" by those who label themselves "Messianic Jews" or some variety of mainstream Christian, that's not how they identify themselves. In the comments to that question, people specified Natsarim, Messianic Gentile, and Hebrew Christian as their preferred labels. With the one exception of "pictographic meanings", most Hebrew Roots people don't believe any of the things that the rest of the world ascribes to them.

Understanding that the natures of both polls and social media make any conclusions somewhat dubious, the best conclusion I can make is that "Hebrew Roots" seems to be a label that is most commonly used as a catchall pejorative applied to anyone who 1) believes that Yeshua (aka Jesus) is the Messiah and Son of God, 2) is pronomian (in favor of keeping God's Law), 3) practices some religious traditions that Christians associate with Judaism or has adopted more Hebrew or Hebrew-ish vocabulary, and 4) holds any belief that the speaker/writer finds offensive or embarrassing.

Most people whom the rest of the religious world would label as "Hebrew Roots" don't even call themselves that. It's very similar to how the term "racist" is used by most people on the political left to mean "someone who doesn't agree with me", which makes the term nearly useless. No wonder so few people want to identify themselves as Hebrew Roots.

My Favorite Messianic & Hebrew Roots YouTube Channels

There are a lot of great YouTube channels created by Yeshua-believing, Torah-keeping folks. Unfortunately, there are a lot of really bad ones too. I subscribe to a long list of channels, but these are the ones that I watch most frequently and can recommend (almost) without reservation:

In no particular order.
And, of course, my own American Torah channel.

There are also a few non-Messianic, non-Torah Observant teachers whom I really appreciate. Just be aware that their perspective is skewed because of that false premise.
And even a few Jewish channels that are pretty good. Again, be aware of a skewed perspective because they haven't yet realized that the Messiah's identity has been hidden from them by centuries of false teachings about him.